So here's the study material for thursday. the first section is about algebraic manipulation, so if you feel comfortable with exponents and the distributive property, feel free to skip it. Section 2 deals with the concepts of sets and functions, which will be essential tools/language for quantifying/describing the objects of our study (the set of congruence classes modulo p), so make sure you can understand the following notations:
Z = {..., -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, ...}
E = {2n: n is a member of Z} (even numbers)
For every x in Z, let f:Z->E be given by f(x)=2x (a function from the integers to the even numbers)
I={g:Z->Z, such that g(0)=0} (the set of functions (not numbers) from the integers to the integers (or a subset of the integers, like the even numbers) such that 0 maps to itself...note that f, as described above, is a member of this set since f(0)=2(0)=0)
the rest of the stuff is not necessary, but could be interesting to some...drop any questions on the wiki, and good luck
PROVISIONAL IDIOT
----------------------------------------------------------
things you should already know:
-------------------------------------------
distributive, associative, communitive properties
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/numbprop.htm
exponents, page 1&2
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/exponent.htm
----------------------------------------
things to study for class:
--------------------------------------------
set notation
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/setnotn.htm
functions
http://www.purplemath.com/modules/fcns.htm (read the first part and study the pictures)
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Bijection.html
----------------------------------------------
what we will learn
------------------------------------------------
http://www.ams.org/featurecolumn/archive/codes1.html
--------------------------------------------------
other things of interest
-------------------------
groups
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_(mathematics)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange%27s_theorem_%28group_theory%29 (generalization of euler's theorem)
complexity theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_complexity_theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complexity_class
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_versus_NP
elliptic curves
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_curve_cryptography
--------------------------------------------------------
PI, I was struck by how continually amazing it is to me that there are indeed numbers (in contexts...set and setting) that do NOT follow the basic 'rules' in the first link. I hope we're not going too far down that road because it will quite frankly cause my brain to suffer a minor explosion... :) -Ceridwen
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.