|
Rethunkin
This version was saved 14 years, 6 months ago
View current version Page history
Saved by mobius@...
on October 9, 2009 at 2:23:50 pm
Rethinking Technological Literacy: Open Sourcing the Process and the Case of Nanotechnological Design
Richard Doyle and Richard Devon
Penn State University
1. As the target population is the general public as well as leading policy makers and educators, technological literacy emerges in the rich hinterland between political science and engineering science. This implies a need to reach out to a wide variety of theorists and interdisciplinary researchers. This abstract is itself the outcome of a collaboration beween a theorist and a designer.
2. The authors are interested in what makes society democratic in a society influenced by any sophisticated body of knowledge and the technical infrastructures and realities yielded by that knowledge. Feedback loops between technology and living systems are well established in the evolution of cognition. We suggest amplifying such feedback loops and evolving collective open source design. Open source solar technology as well as software ( e.g. Linux) are proof of concept for an open source approach to technological literacy. The example of the nanotechnology wikibook ( http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Nanotechnology) provides us with a schematic for growing an open source process for technological literacy and open source design.
3. The important issue is process, because it may not be necessary or possible to pre-load people with technological knowledge. This is a good thing since there is too much to learn. Rather, to teach a process that is democratic and inquiry-based so that in any given situation people can, and will know how to, get informed. Open source and collective intelligence are exciting prospects here. Open access and open source have been engines for technological and scientific literacy already - our goal is to translate that new literacy into new designs, particularly in the realm of nanotechnology.
4. Shifting the focus to the democratization of (nano)technology rather than adaptive processes to ameliorate a hopelessly huge knowledge gap yields 1) we move from a negative perspective to a positive one, 2) we can tackle a doable task rather than a hopeless task, and 3) we have a chance to make a bigger impact and attract more interest in the movement and to emerging possibilities for nanotechnology.
Rethunkin
|
Tip: To turn text into a link, highlight the text, then click on a page or file from the list above.
|
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.